[Patients with COPD hospitalized due to COVID-19 in Spain: a comparison between the first and second wave]. / Pacientes con EPOC hospitalizados por COVID-19 en España: comparación entre la primera y la segunda ola.

Objective: This work aimed to compare the characteristics, progress, and prognosis of patients with COPD hospitalized due to COVID-19 in Spain in the first wave with those of the second wave. Material and methods: This is an observational study of patients hospitalized in Spain with a diagnosis of COPD included in the SEMI-COVID-19 registry. The medical history, symptoms, analytical and radiological results, treatment, and progress of patients with COPD hospitalized in the first wave (from March to June 2020) versus those hospitalized in the second wave (from July to December 2020) were compared. Factors associated with poor prognosis, defined as all-cause mortality and a composite endpoint that included mortality, high-flow oxygen therapy, mechanical ventilation, and ICU admission, were analyzed. Results: Of the 21,642 patients in the SEMI-COVID-19 Registry, 6.9% were diagnosed with COPD: 1,128 (6.8%) in WAVE1 and 374 (7.7%) in WAVE2 (p = 0.04). WAVE2 patients presented less dry cough, fever and dyspnea, hypoxemia (43% vs 36%, p < 0.05), and radiological condensation (46% vs 31%, p < 0.05) than WAVE1 patients. Mortality was lower in WAVE2 (35% vs 28.6%, p = 0.01). In the total sample, mortality and the composite outcome of poor prognosis were lower among patients who received inhalation therapy. Conclusions: Patients with COPD admitted to the hospital due to COVID-19 in the second wave had less respiratory failure and less radiological involvement as well as a better prognosis. These patients should receive bronchodilator treatment if there is no contraindication for it.

[Impact of days elapsed from the onset of symptoms to hospitalization in COVID-19 in-hospital mortality: Time matters]. / Impacto de los días transcurridos desde el inicio de los síntomas hasta la hospitalización en la mortalidad hospitalaria por COVID-19: el tiempo importa.

Background: COVID-19 shows different clinical and pathophysiological stages over time. Theeffect of days elapsed from the onset of symptoms (DEOS) to hospitalization on COVID-19prognostic factors remains uncertain. We analyzed the impact on mortality of DEOS to hospital-ization and how other independent prognostic factors perform when taking this time elapsedinto account. Methods: This retrospective, nationwide cohort study, included patients with confirmed COVID-19 from February 20th and May 6th, 2020. The data was collected in a standardized online datacapture registry. Univariate and multivariate COX-regression were performed in the generalcohort and the final multivariate model was subjected to a sensitivity analysis in an earlypresenting (EP; < 5 DEOS) and late presenting (LP; ≥5 DEOS) group. Results: 7915 COVID-19 patients were included in the analysis, 2324 in the EP and 5591 in theLP group. DEOS to hospitalization was an independent prognostic factor of in-hospital mortalityin the multivariate Cox regression model along with other 9 variables. Each DEOS incrementaccounted for a 4.3% mortality risk reduction (HR 0.957; 95% CI 0.93---0.98). Regarding variationsin other mortality predictors in the sensitivity analysis, the Charlson Comorbidity Index onlyremained significant in the EP group while D-dimer only remained significant in the LP group. Conclusion: When caring for COVID-19 patients, DEOS to hospitalization should be consideredas their need for early hospitalization confers a higher risk of mortality. Different prognosticfactors vary over time and should be studied within a fixed timeframe of the disease.

Impacto de los días transcurridos desde el inicio de los síntomas hasta la hospitalización en la mortalidad hospitalaria por COVID-19: el tiempo importa / Impact of days elapsed from the onset of symptoms to hospitalization in COVID-19 in-hospital mortality: Time matters

Antecedentes La COVID-19 muestra diferentes fases clínicas y fisiopatológicas a lo largo del tiempo. El efecto de los días transcurridos desde el comienzo de los síntomas (DTCS) hasta la hospitalización sobre los factores pronósticos de la COVID-19 sigue siendo incierto. Analizamos el impacto en la mortalidad de los DTCS hasta la hospitalización y cómo se comportan otros factores pronósticos independientes al tener en cuenta dicho tiempo transcurrido. Métodos En este estudio de cohortes nacional retrospectivo se incluyó a pacientes con COVID-19 confirmada entre el 20 de febrero y el 6 de mayo de 2020. Los datos se recopilaron en un registro normalizado de captura de datos en línea. Se realizó una regresión de Cox uni y multifactorial en la cohorte general y el modelo multifactorial final se sometió a un análisis de sensibilidad en un grupo de presentación precoz (PP) < 5 DTCS y otro de presentación tardía (PT) ≥ 5 DTCS). Resultados En el análisis se incluyó a 7.915 pacientes con COVID-19, 2.324 en el grupo de PP y 5.591 en el de PT. Los DTCS hasta la hospitalización fueron un factor pronóstico independiente de mortalidad intrahospitalaria en el modelo de regresión de Cox multifactorial junto con otras nueve variables. Cada incremento en un DTCS supuso una reducción del riesgo de mortalidad del 4,3% (RRI = 0,957; IC 95%, 0,93-0,98). En cuanto a las variaciones de otros factores predictivos de la mortalidad en el análisis de sensibilidad, únicamente el índice de comorbilidad de Charlson siguió siendo significativo en el grupo de PP, mientras que únicamente el dímero D lo siguió siendo en el grupo de PT. Conclusiones Al atender a pacientes con COVID-19 hay que tener en cuenta los DTCS hasta la hospitalización porque la necesidad de hospitalización precoz confiere un mayor riesgo de mortalidad. Los diferentes factores pronósticos varían con el tiempo y deberían estudiarse dentro de un marco temporal fijo de la enfermedad (AU)

Background COVID-19 shows different clinical and pathophysiological stages over time. Theeffect of days elapsed from the onset of symptoms (DEOS) to hospitalization on COVID-19prognostic factors remains uncertain. We analyzed the impact on mortality of DEOS to hospital-ization and how other independent prognostic factors perform when taking this time elapsedinto account. Methods This retrospective, nationwide cohort study, included patients with confirmed COVID-19 from February 20th and May 6th, 2020. The data was collected in a standardized online datacapture registry. Univariate and multivariate COX-regression were performed in the generalcohort and the final multivariate model was subjected to a sensitivity analysis in an earlypresenting (EP; <5 DEOS) and late presenting (LP; ≥5 DEOS) group. Results 7915 COVID-19 patients were included in the analysis, 2324 in the EP and 5591 in theLP group. DEOS to hospitalization was an independent prognostic factor of in-hospital mortalityin the multivariate Cox regression model along with other 9 variables. Each DEOS incrementaccounted for a 4.3% mortality risk reduction (HR 0.957; 95% CI 0.93---0.98). Regarding variationsin other mortality predictors in the sensitivity analysis, the Charlson Comorbidity Index onlyremained significant in the EP group while D-dimer only remained significant in the LP group. Conclusion When caring for COVID-19 patients, DEOS to hospitalization should be consideredas their need for early hospitalization confers a higher risk of mortality. Different prognosticfactors vary over time and should be studied within a fixed timeframe of the disease (AU)

Pacientes con EPOC hospitalizados por COVID-19 en España: comparación entre la primera y la segunda ola / Patients with COPD hospitalized due to COVID-19 in Spain: a comparison between the first and second wave

Objetivo Comparar las características, evolución y pronóstico de los pacientes con enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica (EPOC) hospitalizados por COVID-19 en España en la primera ola con los de la segunda ola. Material y métodos Estudio observacional de los pacientes hospitalizados en territorio español con diagnóstico de EPOC incluidos en el registro SEMI-COVID-19. Se compararon los antecedentes, la clínica, los resultados analíticos y radiológicos, el tratamiento y la evolución de los pacientes con EPOC hospitalizados en la primera ola (desde marzo hasta junio del 2020 [OLA1]) frente a los que fueron ingresados en la segunda ola (desde julio hasta diciembre del 2020 [OLA2]). Se analizaron los factores de mal pronóstico, definidos como mortalidad por todas las causas y un evento combinado que incluía mortalidad, oxigenoterapia con alto flujo, ventilación mecánica e ingreso en la unidad de cuidados intensivos (UCI). Resultado De 21.642 pacientes del registro SEMI-COVID-19, están diagnosticados de EPOC 6,9%, 1.128 (6,8%) en la OLA1 y 374 (7,7%) en la OLA2 (p = 0,04). Los pacientes de la OLA2 presentan menos tos seca, fiebre y disnea, hipoxemia (43 vs. 36%, p < 0,05) y condensación radiológica (46 vs. 31%, p < 0,05) que los de la OLA1. La mortalidad es menor en la OLA2 (35 vs. 28,6%, p = 0,01). En el global de pacientes la mortalidad y la variable combinada de mal pronóstico fue menor entre aquellos que recibieron tratamiento inhalador. Conclusiones Los pacientes con EPOC con ingreso hospitalario por COVID-19 en la segunda ola presentan menos insuficiencia respiratoria y menor afectación radiológica, con mejor pronóstico. Estos deben recibir tratamiento broncodilatador si no hay contraindicación para el mismo (AU)

Objective This work aimed to compare the characteristics, progress, and prognosis of patients with COPD hospitalized due to COVID-19 in Spain in the first wave with those of the second wave. Material and methods This is an observational study of patients hospitalized in Spain with a diagnosis of COPD included in the SEMI-COVID-19 registry. The medical history, symptoms, analytical and radiological results, treatment, and progress of patients with COPD hospitalized in the first wave (from March to June 2020) versus those hospitalized in the second wave (from July to December 2020) were compared. Factors associated with poor prognosis, defined as all-cause mortality and a composite endpoint that included mortality, high-flow oxygen therapy, mechanical ventilation, and ICU admission, were analyzed. Results Of the 21,642 patients in the SEMI-COVID-19 Registry, 6.9% were diagnosed with COPD: 1,128 (6.8%) in WAVE1 and 374 (7.7%) in WAVE2 (p = 0.04). WAVE2 patients presented less dry cough, fever and dyspnea, hypoxemia (43% vs 36%, p < 0.05), and radiological condensation (46% vs 31%, p < 0.05) than WAVE1 patients. Mortality was lower in WAVE2 (35% vs 28.6%, p = 0.01). In the total sample, mortality and the composite outcome of poor prognosis were lower among patients who received inhalation therapy. Conclusions Patients with COPD admitted to the hospital due to COVID-19 in the second wave had less respiratory failure and less radiological involvement as well as a better prognosis. These patients should receive bronchodilator treatment if there is no contraindication for it (AU)

Patients with COPD hospitalized due to COVID-19 in Spain: a comparison between the first and second wave.

OBJECTIVE: This work aimed to compare the characteristics, progress, and prognosis of patients with COPD hospitalized due to COVID-19 in Spain in the first wave with those of the second wave. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is an observational study of patients hospitalized in Spain with a diagnosis of COPD included in the SEMI-COVID-19 registry. The medical history, symptoms, analytical and radiological results, treatment, and progress of patients with COPD hospitalized in the first wave (from March to June 2020) versus those hospitalized in the second wave (from July to December 2020) were compared. Factors associated with poor prognosis, defined as all-cause mortality and a composite endpoint that included mortality, high-flow oxygen therapy, mechanical ventilation, and ICU admission, were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 21,642 patients in the SEMI-COVID-19 Registry, 6.9% were diagnosed with COPD: 1128 (6.8%) in WAVE1 and 374 (7.7%) in WAVE2 (p = 0.04). WAVE2 patients presented less dry cough, fever and dyspnea, hypoxemia (43% vs 36%, p < 0.05), and radiological condensation (46% vs 31%, p < 0.05) than WAVE1 patients. Mortality was lower in WAVE2 (35% vs 28.6%, p = 0.01). In the total sample, mortality and the composite outcome of poor prognosis were lower among patients who received inhalation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with COPD admitted to the hospital due to COVID-19 in the second wave had less respiratory failure and less radiological involvement as well as a better prognosis. These patients should receive bronchodilator treatment if there is no contraindication for it.

Impact of days elapsed from the onset of symptoms to hospitalization in COVID-19 in-hospital mortality: time matters.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 shows different clinical and pathophysiological stages over time. The effect of days elapsed from the onset of symptoms (DEOS) to hospitalization on COVID-19 prognostic factors remains uncertain. We analyzed the impact on mortality of DEOS to hospitalization and how other independent prognostic factors perform when taking this time elapsed into account. METHODS: This retrospective, nationwide cohort study, included patients with confirmed COVID-19 from February 20th and May 6th, 2020. The data was collected in a standardized online data capture registry. Univariate and multivariate COX-regression were performed in the general cohort and the final multivariate model was subjected to a sensitivity analysis in an early presenting (EP; <5 DEOS) and late presenting (LP; ≥5 DEOS) group. RESULTS: 7915 COVID-19 patients were included in the analysis, 2324 in the EP and 5591 in the LP group. DEOS to hospitalization was an independent prognostic factor of in-hospital mortality in the multivariate Cox regression model along with other 9 variables. Each DEOS increment accounted for a 4.3% mortality risk reduction (HR 0.957; 95% CI 0.93-0.98). Regarding variations in other mortality predictors in the sensitivity analysis, the Charlson Comorbidity Index only remained significant in the EP group while D-dimer only remained significant in the LP group. CONCLUSION: When caring for COVID-19 patients, DEOS to hospitalization should be considered as their need for early hospitalization confers a higher risk of mortality. Different prognostic factors vary over time and should be studied within a fixed timeframe of the disease.

Prescripciones potencialmente inapropiadas en el tratamiento ambulatorio de pacientes ancianos / Potentially inappropriate prescriptions in the ambulatory treatment of elderly patients

Introducción: Objetivo: conocer el porcentaje de prescripciones potencialmente inapropiadas según los criterios STOPP/START en los tratamientos ambulatorios de los pacientes mayores de 65 años que ingresan en una unidad de medicina interna, e identificar los errores de prescripción más frecuentes. Material y métodos: Estudio observacional prospectivo realizado entre octubre y diciembre de 2012. Variables registradas: edad, sexo, índice de comorbilidad de Charlson, motivo de ingreso y tratamiento farmacológico ambulatorio. Resultados: Se recogieron los datos de 131 pacientes (edad media 80,2 años; 58,8% varones, mediana del índice de comorbilidad de Charlson 2; media de medicamentos por paciente: 8,6). Principales motivos de ingreso: descompensación de insuficiencia cardiaca, infección respiratoria, exacerbación de EPOC, infección del tracto urinario, neumonía y síndrome constitucional. Se detectaron 121 prescripciones potencialmente inapropiadas en 73 pacientes (55,7%). Los criterios STOPP más frecuentes fueron las duplicidades terapéuticas. Los criterios START más frecuentes fueron la omisión de estatinas y antiagregantes plaquetarios en la prevención primaria del riesgo cardiovascular en pacientes con diabetes mellitus y al menos un factor de riesgo cardiovascular. Conclusiones: El porcentaje de pacientes con prescripciones inapropiadas encontrado es similar al obtenido en estudios semejantes. Más de la mitad de los pacientes ancianos presentaron al menos una prescripción inapropiada. Esto hace necesario una búsqueda conjunta de errores por exceso y por defecto en la prescripción de fármacos, con el fin de realizar una evaluación más completa de la práctica de prescripción e intentar conseguir la optimización de la terapéutica de los pacientes mayores, especialmente los más frágiles (AU)

Introduction: The aim of this study was to establish the percentage of potentially inappropriate prescriptions, according to STOPP/START criteria, in the ambulatory treatments of patients over65 years admitted to an internal medicine unit, and to identify the most common prescription errors. Material and methods: A prospective, observational study was performed between October and December 2012. The variable recorded were, age, gender, Charlson comorbidity index, reason for hospitalisation and pharmacological ambulatory treatment. Results: Data from 131 patients were collected (Mean age: 80.2 years; 58.8% male, mean Charlson comorbidity index: 2; mean number of medications per patient: 8.6). Main reasons for hospitalisation: decompensated heart failure, respiratory infection, exacerbated COPD, urinary tract infection, pneumonia, and unintended weight loss. There were 121 potentially inappropriate prescriptions detected in 73 patients (55.7%). The most common STOPP criteria were therapeutic duplicities. The most common START criteria were the omission of statins and antiplatelets in primary prevention for cardiovascular risk in patients with diabetes mellitus and at least one cardiovascular risk factor. Conclusions: The percentage of patients with inappropriate prescriptions was similar to those obtained in similar studies. Over 50% of elderly patients had at least one inappropriate prescription. This warrants a joint search for errors by excess and by default in the prescription of medications, with the aim of performing a more complete evaluation of prescription practice and to achieve optimization of therapy in elderly patients, especially the most fragile (AU)

[Potentially inappropriate prescriptions in the ambulatory treatment of elderly patients]. / Prescripciones potencialmente inapropiadas en el tratamiento ambulatorio de pacientes ancianos.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to establish the percentage of potentially inappropriate prescriptions, according to STOPP/START criteria, in the ambulatory treatments of patients over 65 years admitted to an internal medicine unit, and to identify the most common prescription errors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective, observational study was performed between October and December 2012. The variable recorded were,age, gender, Charlson comorbidity index, reason for hospitalisation and pharmacological ambulatory treatment. RESULTS: Data from 131 patients were collected (Mean age: 80.2 years; 58.8% male, mean Charlson comorbidity index: 2; mean number of medications per patient: 8.6). Main reasons for hospitalisation: decompensated heart failure, respiratory infection, exacerbated COPD, urinary tract infection, pneumonia, and unintended weight loss. There were 121 potentially inappropriate prescriptions detected in 73 patients (55.7%). The most common STOPP criteria were therapeutic duplicities. The most common START criteria were the omission of statins and antiplatelets in primary prevention for cardiovascular risk in patients with diabetes mellitus and at least one cardiovascular risk factor. CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of patients with inappropriate prescriptions was similar to those obtained in similar studies. Over 50% of elderly patients had at least one inappropriate prescription. This warrants a joint search for errors by excess and by default in the prescription of medications, with the aim of performing a more complete evaluation of prescription practice and to achieve optimization of therapy in elderly patients, especially the most fragile.

Seguridad del paciente

La seguridad del paciente es un factor esencial de la calidad asistencial y desde la publicación del informe \"Errar es humano\" es objeto de atención general. Las estrategias de mejora han estimulado el desarrollo de modelos que permiten un mejor conocimiento de los efectos adversos ligados a la asistencia sanitaria. Los sistemas de comunicación de efectos adversos generan información que permitirá adoptar medidas que incrementen la calidad asistencial. Los efectos adversos más comunes son los relacionados con el uso de medicamentos y con frecuencia son evitables. Para disminuirlos, detectarlos y mitigarlos cuando se producen, se pueden emplear estrategias dirigidas a reducir la complejidad, optimizar la información y la automatización de procesos. Aunque el progreso sea lento los cambios se están acelerando especialmente en la implantación de sistemas de prescripción electrónica y difusión de prácticas seguras.

Osteopetrosis del adulto. Conceptos actuales / Osteopetrosis of the adult. Current concepts

Se presentan cuatro casos de osteopetrosis del adulto, entidad poco frecuente, recogidos en nuestro hospital desde 1985 hasta 2005. Se revisa la patogenia y se actualizan conceptos y clasificación. Las manifestaciones clínicas se corresponden con otras publicaciones en las que la edad al diagnóstico es muy variable y el primer síntoma oscila desde dolor óseo a un hallazgo tras una fractura. Se revisan las mutaciones genéticas clásicas de todos los tipos, actualizando conceptos. Se introduce la propuesta de retirada de la osteopetrosis tipo I del adulto, ya que su patogenia parece un defecto intrínseco osteoblástico(AU)

We presents four cases of adult osteopetrosis, a very rare disease, compiled from our hospital from 1985 to 2005. Revising the pathogenesis and updating the current concept and classification. The clinical manifestations correspond with other publications where the age at diagnosis is highly variable and the first symptom oscillate from bone pain to a fracture. Presents the classic genetic mutations of all types updating concepts. Introducing the propose withdrawal of adult osteoporosis type I, because the pathogenesis seemed a intrinsic osteoblastic defect(AU)

[Drug-related interventions made through a computerized prescription order entry system in an Internal Medicine unit]. / Intervenciones farmacoterapéuticas realizadas mediante un programa de prescripción electrónica en una unidad de medicina interna.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this article is to describe the drug-related interventions made in the prescriptions with a computerized order entry system and to determine their frequency and clinical relevance in order to propose improvement actions. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Observational descriptive study. Drug-related interventions made in the inpatient's prescriptions of an Internal Medicine unit from January to May of 2007 were analyzed and recorded. The frequency of the intervention causes and of the drugs involved was determined.The clinical significance and impact of the recommendations were also determined. RESULTS: A total of 441 interventions were recorded, 0.73 per patient. The most frequent was the proposal of intravenous to oral conversion (45%), mainly with acetaminophen (63%) and protons pump inhibitors (24%). This was followed by replacement of drugs not included in the guide (15% of interventions), mainly involving cardiovascular and central nervous system drugs (23% each one). Educational actions proposed included a campaign to promote intravenous to oral conversion and a program involving therapeutic equivalent replacement. The most clinically significant interventions were due to dosage errors, therapeutic duplicities, off label medications and adverse events. A proposal was made to include a new module in the medical order entry system that alerts on the established maximum doses for each drug, and new protocols for the treatment of certain conditions. Sixty percent of the interventions achieved an improvement in efficiency. DISCUSSION: We conclude that drug therapy intervention analysis can identify items that can be improved, set educational actions for physicians and new protocols for certain conditions. Innovative actions can be introduced into the medical order entry system in order to improve drug safety.

Intervenciones farmacoterapéuticas realizadas mediante un programa de prescripción electrónica en una unidad de medicina interna / Drug-related interventions made through a computerized prescription order entry system in an Internal Medicine Unit

Introducción: El objetivo de este trabajo es describir las intervenciones farmacoterapéuticas realizadas en las prescripciones, mediante un programa de prescripción electrónica, y determinar la frecuencia y la relevancia clínica para proponer acciones de mejora. Material y método: Se trata de un estudio descriptivo observacional. Hemos analizado y registrado las intervenciones farmacoterapéuticas realizadas en los pacientes ingresados en una unidad de medicina interna entre enero y mayo de 2007, y determinado la frecuencia de los motivos de intervención y fármacos, la significación clínica y el impacto de las recomendaciones. Resultados: Se han realizado 441 intervenciones, 0,73/paciente. La más frecuente fue la propuesta de secuenciación de la terapia (45%), fundamentalmente con paracetamol (63%) e inhibidores de la bomba de protones (24%). Después, la sustitución de medicamentos no incluidos en la guía (15%), los grupos mayoritarios: cardiovascular y sistema nervioso central (23% ambos). Las acciones formativas propuestas fueron una campaña para promocionar la terapia secuencial y un programa de equivalentes terapéuticos. Las intervenciones clínicamente más significativas fueron motivadas por errores de dosificación, duplicidades, medicamentos sin indicación y reacciones adversas. Se ha propuesto introducir en el programa de prescripción un módulo de alerta de dosis máximas y nuevos protocolos de patologías. El 60% de las intervenciones consiguieron mejorar la eficiencia. Discusión: Concluimos que el análisis de las intervenciones farmacoterapéuticas realizadas mediante un programa de prescripción electrónica permite identificar actuaciones dirigidas a médicos y patologías para protocolizar; así como posibilidades de innovación en el programa para aumentar la seguridad del tratamiento (AU)

Introduction: The objective of this article is to describe the drug-related interventions made in the prescriptions with a computerized order entry system and to determine their frequency and clinical relevance in order to propose improvement actions. Material and method: Observational descriptive study. Drug-related interventions made in the inpatient's prescriptions of an Internal Medicine unit from January to May of 2007 were analyzed and recorded. The frequency of the intervention causes and of the drugs involved was determined. The clinical significance and impact of the recommendations were also determined. Results: A total of 441 interventions were recorded, 0.73 per patient. The most frequent was the proposal of intravenous to oral conversion (45%), mainly with acetaminophen (63%) and protons pump inhibitors (24%). This was followed by replacement of drugs not included in the guide (15% of interventions), mainly involving cardiovascular and central nervous system drugs (23% each one). Educational actions proposed included a campaign to promote intravenous to oral conversion and a program involving therapeutic equivalent replacement. The most clinically significant interventions were due to dosage errors, therapeutic duplicities, off label medications and adverse events. A proposal was made to include a new module in the medical order entry system that alerts on the established maximum doses for each drug, and new protocols for the treatment of certain conditions. Sixty percent of the interventions achieved an improvement in efficiency. Discussion: We conclude that drug therapy intervention analysis can identify items that can be improved, set educational actions for physicians and new protocols for certain conditions. Innovative actions can be introduced into the medical order entry system in order to improve drug safety (AU)

[Perception of clinical practice derived risks compared to adverse effects detected in an internal medicine service]. / Percepción de riesgos derivados de la práctica clínica frente a los efectos adversos detectados en un servicio de medicina interna.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To know how the health care workers perceive the risks derived from the care practice. To estimate the most frequent adverse effects (AE) and establish differences and similarities between the perception of risks and the AE produced. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A self-administered questionnaire was applied to all the workers of an Internal Medicine Department of a General University Hospital on perception of risks and safety of the patient. After, and by using the screening guide of the IDEA project, edition 1, the clinical histories of the patients selected were analyzed by medical residents of preventive Medicine and Internal Medicine. RESULTS: Questionnaire. Fifty questionnaires we sent with a 42% response rate. Risks prioritized by obtaining a lower mean score: there is not action plan against catastrophes (2.79/10) and lack of spaces to report (3/10); those having greater percentage of open questions: long maintenance of urinary probes (47.61%) and inadequate prescription of antibiotics (33.33%). Study of AE. Incidence of patients with AE: 25% (95% CI 11.06-38.9). Incidence of AE: 26.6% (95% CI 12.6-40.6). 41.6% of AE was related to medication, 25% to nosocomial infection, 16.66% to technical problems in procedures and 16.66% were related to nursing cares. CONCLUSIONS: The perception of the health care workers on health care practice derived risks is different from the adverse events that really appear. The professionals are concerned about the information to patients than about scientific and technical quality. The most frequent adverse events produced are those related with medication. The only common point is concern for nosocomial infection.

Percepción de riesgos derivados de la práctica clínica frente a los efectos adversos detectados en un servicio de medicina interna / Perception of clinical practice derived risks compared to adverse effects detected in an internal medicine service

Fundamento y objetivos. Conocer la percepción que los profesionales sanitarios tienen sobre los riesgos derivados de la práctica asistencial, estimar los efectos adversos (EA) más frecuentes, y establecer las diferencias y similitudes entre la percepción de riesgos y los EA producidos. Material y método. Se realizó una encuesta autoadministrada sobre percepción de riesgos y seguridad del paciente a todo el personal de un servicio de medicina interna de un hospital general universitario. Posteriormente, y a través de la guía de cribado del proyecto IDEA 1ª edición, se analizaron las historias clínicas de los pacientes seleccionados por médicos residentes de medicina preventiva y de medicina interna. Resultados. Encuesta. Se enviaron 50 cuestionarios y se obtuvo una tasa de respuesta del 42%. Los riesgos priorizados por obtener una puntuación media más baja fueron la no existencia de plan de actuación frente a catástrofes (2,79 sobre 10) y la falta de espacios para informar (3 sobre 10.); y por mayor porcentaje en las preguntas abiertas, el mantenimiento prolongado de sondajes urinarios, con un 47.61% y la prescripción inadecuada de antibióticos (33,33%). Estudio sobre efectos adversos. Incidencia acumulada (IA) de pacientes con EA: 25% (intervalo de confianza [IC] 95% 11,06-38,9); IA de EA: 26,6% (IC 95% 12,6-40,6). El 41,6% de los EA estuvieron relacionados con la medicación, un 25% con la infección nosocomial, y con problemas técnicos de procedimientos y con fallos en los cuidados del paciente un 16,66% cada uno. Conclusiones. La percepción de los profesionales sanitarios sobre los riesgos derivados de la práctica asistencial es diferente a los sucesos adversos que realmente se terminan materializando. Los profesionales están más preocupados por la información a los pacientes y por la calidad científico-técnica. Los sucesos adversos más frecuentes que se producen son los relacionados con la medicación. El único punto común es la preocupación por la infección nosocomial (AU)

Background and objective. To know how the health care workers perceive the risks derived from the care practice. To estimate the most frequent adverse effects (AE) and establish differences and similarities between the perception of risks and the AE produced. Material and method. A self-administered questionnaire was applied to all the workers of an Internal Medicine Department of a General University Hospital on perception of risks and safety of the patient. After, and by using the screening guide of the IDEA project, edition 1, the clinical histories of the patients selected were analyzed by medical residents of preventive Medicine and Internal Medicine. Results. Questionnaire. Fifty questionnaires we sent with a 42% response rate. Risks prioritized by obtaining a lower mean score: there is not action plan against catastrophes (2.79/10) and lack of spaces to report (3/10); those having greater percentage of open questions: long maintenance of urinary probes (47.61%) and inadequate prescription of antibiotics (33.33%). Study of AE. Incidence of patients with AE: 25% (95% CI 11.06-38.9). Incidence of AE: 26.6% (95% CI 12.6-40.6). 41.6% of AE was related to medication, 25% to nosocomial infection, 16.66% to technical problems in procedures and 16.66% were related to nursing cares. Conclusions. The perception of the health care workers on health care practice derived risks is different from the adverse events that really appear. The professionals are concerned about the information to patients than about scientific and technical quality. The most frequent adverse events produced are those related with medication. The only common point is concern for nosocomial infection (AU)

Seguridad del paciente y gestión de riesgos. Réplica / No disponible

No disponible

Seguridad del paciente / Patient safety

La seguridad del paciente es un factor esencial de la calidad asistencial y desde la publicación del informe “Errar es humano” es objeto de atención general. Las estrategias de mejora han estimulado el desarrollo de modelos que permiten un mejor conocimiento de los efectos adversos ligados a la asistencia sanitaria. Los sistemas de comunicación de efectos adversos generan información que permitirá adoptar medidas que incrementen la calidad asistencial. Los efectos adversos más comunes son los relacionados con el uso de medicamentos y con frecuencia son evitables. Para disminuirlos, detectarlos y mitigarlos cuando se producen, se pueden emplear estrategias dirigidas a reducir la complejidad, optimizar la información y la automatización de procesos. Aunque el progreso sea lento los cambios se están acelerando especialmente en la implantación de sistemas de prescripción electrónica y difusión de prácticas seguras (AU)

Ensuring patient safety is essential for better health care. Safety have gripped public attention ever since the release of the report “To Err is Human”. To find strategies of promotion of patient safety has stimulated models that improve knowledge of adverse events. Adverse drug events are the most common cause of injury to hospitalized patients and are often preventable. Many tactics are available to make system changes to reduce errors and adverse events; they fall into five categories: Reduce complexity, optimise information processing, automate wisely, use constraints, and mitigate the unwanted side effects of change. These tactics can be deployed to support any of the three strategic components of error prevention, detection, and mitigation. Although progress has been slow, the pace of change is likely to accelerate, particularly in implementation of electronic health records and diffusion of safe practices (AU)

[Patient safety and quality of care]. / Seguridad del paciente y calidad asistencial.

Adverse effects related to health care are common and partly avoidable. We need to identify how and why adverse events occur and how system defects may contribute to their occurrence. Systems and processes can be designed to help prevent errors and decrease harm that occurs when they are not intercepted. Tactics to reduce errors and mitigate their adverse effects include reducing complexity and optimizing information processing. Implementation of information technology may offer great promise but the most important is to make an effort to promote a culture of safety.

Seguridad del paciente y calidad asistencial / Patient safety and quality of care

Los efectos adversos relacionados con la atención sanitaria son frecuentes y en muchos casos evitables. Es preciso conocer cómo se producen y los defectos del sistema que han contribuido a ello. Los sistemas y procesos deben estar diseñados para prevenir los errores y disminuir el daño que ocasionan si no son evitados. Entre las estrategias para prevenirlos está reducir la complejidad de los procesos y optimizar el manejo de la información. La implementación de las tecnologías de la información puede ofrecer una gran contribución, pero la prioridad es promover una cultura de la seguridad (AU)

Adverse effects related to health care are common and partly avoidable. We need to identify how and why adverse events occur and how system defects may contribute to their occurrence. Systems and processes can be designed to help prevent errors and decrease harm that occurs when they are not intercepted. Tactics to reduce errors and mitigate their adverse effects include reducing complexity and optimizing information processing. Implementation of information technology may offer great promise but the most important is to make an effort to promote a culture of safety (AU)

[Patient safety]. / Seguridad del paciente.

Ensuring patient safety is essential for better heath care. Safety have gripped public attention ever since the release of the report "To Err is Human". To find strategies of promotion of patient safety has stimulated models that improve knowledge of adverse events. Adverse drug events are the most common cause of injury to hospitalized patients and are often preventable. Many tactics are available to make system changes to reduce errors and adverse events; they fall into five categories: Reduce complexity, optimise information processing, automate wisely, use constraints, and mitigate the unwanted side effects of change. These tactics can be deployed to support any of the three strategic components of error prevention, detection, and mitigation. Although progress has been slow, the pace of change is likely to accelerate, particularly in implementation of electronic health records and diffusion of safe practices.